Intercom Comparison
Video Entry Systems
International Guide
Urmet vs 2N: Complete Intercom Comparison – 2026 Guide
When European and international property managers evaluate next-generation intercom systems, Urmet‘s retrofitting legacy meets 2N‘s IP-native innovation. One solves the retrofit problem. The other solves the future-readiness problem. Which philosophy wins for your building?
Introduction: Legacy Retrofit Versus IP-Native Architecture
The modern intercom market presents a fundamental choice between two approaches, each born from a different historical problem. Urmet, the Italian veteran founded in 1937, built its reputation solving the European apartment retrofit crisis: how do you add video calling to buildings already wired with decades-old analog intercom infrastructure? The answer: engineer systems that work with legacy wiring, not against it.
2N, the Czech innovator founded in 1994, approached intercom systems from the opposite direction. Rather than accommodate legacy wiring, 2N engineered from the ground up for IP networks—the infrastructure that was already being built into modern buildings anyway. 2N’s philosophy: why compromise with old wiring when buildings are moving to networked everything (lighting, access control, fire systems, management systems) anyway?
This philosophical divide cascades through everything: how systems scale, how they integrate with building technologies, how they handle video quality and smart features, and what they cost over a building’s 15-20 year lifecycle. Urmet is pragmatic retrofitting. 2N is forward-thinking integration.
Not sure which fits your building? Sipko Security evaluates both systems and provides professional installation and integration services tailored to your specific infrastructure.
What Is Urmet? — The European Retrofit Specialist
2-Wire Legacy Technology
IPerCom IP Platform
Urmet, based in Turin, Italy, has spent nearly nine decades perfecting one core competency: adding modern video communication to buildings that already have intercom wiring in the walls. Born in post-war Europe when thousands of apartment blocks were being wired with analog 2-wire intercom systems, Urmet developed the philosophy of working with what exists rather than demanding complete infrastructure replacement.
The company’s flagship innovation is the 2Voice platform: a digital intercom system that transmits audio, video, and control signals over a simple non-polarized 2-wire connection. This means Urmet hardware often connects directly to wiring left behind by previous analog systems decades earlier, eliminating the need for expensive new cabling work. For buildings ready to embrace full IP networks, Urmet’s IPerCom platform offers IP-based communication with support for very long device distances (up to 3 kilometers via fiber), useful for large campuses.
Sipko Insight: Urmet is the pragmatist’s choice. If your building already has intercom wiring—whether 2-wire, 5-wire, or proprietary—Urmet’s systems are engineered to make use of it rather than force replacement. For many European buildings, this means retrofit projects that take days instead of weeks.
What Is 2N? — The Czech IP-Native Pioneer
IP-Native Architecture
Helios IP Series
2N, founded in the Czech Republic in 1994, built its reputation on a radically different premise: intercom systems should be designed for IP networks from the ground up, not as retrofits onto legacy wiring. While Urmet was solving the “how do we reuse old wiring” problem, 2N was solving the “how do we build systems that integrate seamlessly into modern building networks” problem.
2N’s flagship platform is Helios IP, a comprehensive, network-native intercom ecosystem that treats intercoms as first-class citizens on the building’s data network rather than as specialized analog devices with optional network capabilities. Every Helios IP device is IP-native from the silicon level—the hardware is engineered to speak fluent network protocols. This means Helios IP systems scale elegantly across multiple buildings, integrate with building automation and access control without adapter modules, and benefit from network infrastructure investments the building is already making anyway.
2N also maintains a parallel line of entry phones and door systems designed for environments where IP networks exist but deep intercom integration isn’t the primary need. These range from simple IP-based door phones to complex video intercom stations with integrated access control readers and emergency call capability.
Helpful Info: 2N is the engineering-first choice. If your building is modern, networked, and planning to integrate building systems, 2N’s IP-native architecture offers advantages legacy-wiring-compatible systems can’t match.
Head-to-Head: Core Metrics
| Feature | Urmet (Italian Retrofit Specialist) | 2N (Czech IP Native) |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1937, Turin, Italy | 1994, Prague, Czech Republic |
| Primary Philosophy | Retrofit-compatible, legacy wiring reuse | IP-native, network-first architecture |
| Flagship Platform | 2Voice (2-wire) + IPerCom (IP) | Helios IP Series (unified IP) |
| Core Technology | 2-wire analog digital or standard IP | Pure IP at every layer (hardware to software) |
| Best Fit | Building retrofits, legacy wiring reuse, European apartments | New construction, networked buildings, campus integration |
| Installation Approach | Utilizes existing wiring when compatible | Assumes modern IP network infrastructure exists |
| Video Integration | Single/limited feed, IPerCom extends capability | Native multi-camera integration, analytics |
| Access Control Integration | Via separate module or upgrade path | Native readers, unified system |
Architecture & Network Philosophy: 2-Wire Pragmatism vs IP-Native Design
The deepest technical difference between Urmet and 2N is almost philosophical: how should an intercom system relate to a building’s broader infrastructure? These competing visions shape installation complexity, system flexibility, and long-term operational costs.
Urmet’s 2-Wire Retrofit Philosophy
Urmet’s core architecture revolves around this premise: most buildings already have something in the walls. Whether it’s 50-year-old 2-wire analog intercom cabling, abandoned telephone wiring, or even old coaxial cable, Urmet engineered systems to make use of it. The 2Voice platform was specifically designed so installers don’t need to worry about wire polarity—a simple engineering choice that has massive practical implications. In a typical Urmet 2Voice retrofit, the installer identifies existing intercom risers in the building, connects the new Urmet master unit to the input side, and branches out to individual apartments via existing distributor modules or new ones installed in the same wall spaces. No new walls opened. No re-running cable through risers. In many European apartment retrofits, this cuts installation time and cost by 50-70% compared to systems requiring new infrastructure.
For buildings pursuing IP networks, Urmet’s IPerCom platform offers an upgrade path, but it’s a migration—you’re moving from 2-wire to IP rather than starting IP-native.
2N’s IP-Native Philosophy
2N’s architecture assumes IP networks are the building’s foundation. Every Helios IP device is engineered as a network device first and an intercom second. This means:
- No legacy wiring compromises—devices are designed for what’s optimal on a network, not what’s backward-compatible with decades-old analog.
- Seamless scaling—adding devices means adding them to the network, not reconfiguring central frames or distributor modules.
- Native integration—video cameras, access readers, call recording, and analytics are designed into the platform rather than bolted on.
- Future-proof—when the building adds new capabilities (emergency communication, building automation integration, AI-powered occupancy tracking), Helios IP systems can accommodate them through software and firmware updates rather than hardware replacement.
The tradeoff is obvious: 2N systems require the building to have (or be willing to invest in) proper network infrastructure. If a building’s network is undersized, poorly documented, or managed by unprofessional IT staff, 2N systems can expose those weaknesses. Urmet’s 2-wire approach avoids this dependency—2Voice operates independently of the building’s IT infrastructure, which can be attractive to property managers who want intercom reliability decoupled from potentially chaotic IT environments.
Practical Implications
Retrofit of European Apartment Block with Existing Wiring: Urmet’s retrofit advantage is enormous. If compatible wiring exists and functions, a Urmet 2Voice retrofit can be completed in days with minimal disruption.
Modern Office Building with Proper IT Infrastructure: 2N’s IP-native approach is the natural choice. Every device benefits from the network infrastructure already in place, and the system scales elegantly as the building grows.
Mixed-Age Property (old residential + new commercial wings): This is where things get complex. You might use Urmet 2Voice in the older residential sections (reusing existing wiring) and 2N Helios in newer commercial sections. However, bridging between the two systems requires special gateway hardware and introduces management complexity.
Verdict: Urmet’s 2-wire approach is pragmatic retrofitting for buildings with existing wiring. 2N’s IP-native approach is engineering for the future. Neither is objectively superior—they serve different building types and market segments.
Network & Infrastructure Assessment: The choice between Urmet and 2N depends heavily on your building’s existing wiring and network readiness. Sipko Security conducts free infrastructure assessments to determine 2-wire compatibility, network readiness, and the most cost-effective deployment path for either platform.
Video Quality, Hardware Engineering, and Device Design
Urmet’s Hardware Approach: Urmet’s door stations use robust zinc alloy construction rated to IP55 (dust and water protection). Current-generation Urmet cameras offer up to 110° horizontal and 92° vertical fields of view, and higher-end models include gesture and voice control. Indoor stations are available in both audio-only and video variants, reflecting Urmet’s modular philosophy: you buy only what you need. For a building where individual apartments don’t need video (perhaps due to privacy preferences or cost constraints), Urmet offers audio-only 2Voice units that cost less than full video stations. This modularity is a Urmet strength—the platform doesn’t force every apartment onto video.
2N’s Hardware Approach: 2N’s Helios IP door stations are designed around the premise that modern video is always available. 2N typically publishes fewer hardware specs than Urmet but emphasizes integration and processing capability. Helios cameras support features like audio analytics (detecting broken glass or screams), occupancy counting, and thermal imaging on high-end models. Indoor stations are touchscreen-based with multi-window capability—you can view the front door plus multiple supplementary cameras simultaneously. 2N’s hardware is designed to showcase network capabilities rather than to be the simplest possible option at each price point.
Verdict: Urmet excels at offering modular options for different apartment types and preferences. 2N excels at leveraging network capabilities to offer more advanced video features and integration. For a building where every apartment needs identical capability, 2N’s streamlined approach may be simpler. For mixed-building configurations where some units need video and others don’t, Urmet’s modularity is an advantage.
Scalability: From Apartments to Campuses
How these systems handle growth reveals their fundamental architectural differences.
Urmet Scaling: Distributor-Based for Apartments, IP-Based for Large Sites
Urmet’s 2Voice platform scales by adding distributor modules to existing wiring infrastructure. A 100-apartment building can expand to 150 apartments by adding a new distributor module in the building’s vertical space and running connections to the new units. This approach works well for mid-sized apartment blocks where the building’s wiring infrastructure is already designed for expansion. However, it caps out eventually—beyond a certain number of apartments (typically 300-400 on a single 2-wire bus), the system needs segmentation or an upgrade to IPerCom IP.
For campuses or buildings planning to scale beyond 2Voice limitations, Urmet’s IPerCom IP platform takes over, offering more traditional network-based scaling: add devices to the network, they’re immediately integrated. However, this isn’t a seamless upgrade—it’s a migration from one platform to another, with different management interfaces and capabilities.
2N Scaling: Network-Native Growth
2N’s Helios IP scales the way modern IT systems scale: add devices to the network, they’re integrated. There’s no distributor modules, no bus limitations, no migration paths between platforms. A building with 100 Helios IP devices can scale to 1000 devices by expanding the network infrastructure—something modern buildings are doing anyway for lighting, HVAC, parking systems, etc. The network investment benefits the entire building, not just the intercom system.
For multi-building campuses, 2N’s advantage is particularly clear. All devices across all buildings exist on one network and one management platform. A security desk in Building A can instantly see and control intercoms in Buildings B, C, and D. Urmet can do this too, but it requires either running separate 2Voice systems per building (and manually managing inter-building calls) or migrating to IPerCom, which is more complex.
Verdict
For mid-sized apartment buildings not planning major expansion, Urmet’s distributor-based scaling is simpler and more economical. For larger properties, campuses, or buildings planning significant growth, 2N’s network-native scaling avoids architectural dead ends and complexity.
Installation: Speed, Complexity, and Hidden Costs
Urmet Installation Reality
Urmet’s retrofitting promise is compelling: if compatible 2-wire wiring exists and functions, installation can be remarkably fast. A 150-apartment building with working 2-wire infrastructure might see a complete Urmet 2Voice retrofit in 3-5 days with a 2-3 person crew, primarily swapping out old apartment stations for new ones and installing the new master unit. Wall disruption is minimal—installers work inside existing wall spaces rather than cutting new ones.
However—and this is critical—this advantage exists only when compatible wiring is present and in working condition. If wiring is damaged, missing, or incompatible (e.g., a building using old polarized telephone wiring that’s not compatible with non-polarized 2-wire), the retrofit advantage evaporates. You’re running new cabling just like any other system, and Urmet loses its primary cost justification. Get wiring tested before assuming a Urmet retrofit will be quick and cheap.
2N Installation Reality
2N installation assumes the building has an IT network. If it does—and most modern buildings do—installation complexity shifts from “run new cabling” to “configure network”. A 2N Helios IP installation typically involves:
- Network assessment and capacity planning (can the existing network handle intercom traffic?).
- VLAN setup and routing configuration (intercoms usually get their own isolated network segment).
- Device provisioning and configuration (each device is individually set up).
- Integration with access control, fire systems, or building management (if required).
For a modern office building with professional IT staff, this is routine. For a residential property where IT isn’t handled professionally, this adds complexity and potential cost. If the building’s network isn’t properly documented or isn’t regularly serviced, adding Helios IP devices might expose infrastructure weaknesses that cost more to fix than the intercom system itself.
Professional Assessment Is Mandatory
For Urmet: Have a professional test existing wiring before assuming retrofit cost savings. For 2N: Have a professional assess network infrastructure before assuming 2N installation will be straightforward. Hidden costs—damaged wiring, inadequate network capacity, undocumented infrastructure—are where both systems can surprise you.
Professional Installation & Infrastructure Planning: Whether you choose Urmet or 2N, professional installation is essential. Sipko Security specializes in both brands, conducts free wiring and network assessments, and handles complete installation with full system testing.
System Integration and Building-Wide Capabilities
Urmet’s Integration Approach: Urmet’s integration philosophy is conservative by design. The 2Voice platform’s main integrations are with home automation (select handsets include radio transmitter channels for lighting and appliance control) and basic access control through external relay modules. For a residential apartment building where the intercom is the primary building security system and integration needs are limited, this is fine. For large commercial properties wanting to tie intercoms into a comprehensive access control, fire alarm, and emergency response system, Urmet requires more manual work—you’re usually managing the intercom system as a separate silo rather than as part of a unified whole.
2N’s Integration Approach: 2N positions Helios IP as the integration foundation rather than a standalone device. Access control readers can be integrated natively (no external relay modules needed—the reader is part of the Helios IP platform). Fire alarm interfaces, emergency call buttons, occupancy sensors, and video analytics are designed into the system from day one. For large buildings or campuses, 2N’s architecture means a unified management dashboard where security staff can answer intercom calls, view video, control access, and manage emergency situations all from one interface rather than juggling multiple separate systems.
Verdict: If your building is primarily residential and intercom is relatively independent from other systems, Urmet’s simpler approach is fine. If you’re managing a large property or campus where intercom needs to work hand-in-hand with access control, emergency systems, and building management, 2N’s integration-first architecture saves cost and complexity over the system’s lifetime.
Total Cost of Ownership: Hardware, Installation, and Expansion
Raw hardware price comparisons between Urmet and 2N are meaningless without context. The real cost variable is your building’s existing infrastructure.
Urmet Cost Profile
Hardware: Individual Urmet 2Voice components are moderately priced, with door stations typically in the €150-400 range depending on features and video capability.
Installation (Compatible Wiring Exists): This is where Urmet shines. If existing 2-wire cabling is present and compatible, labor cost for a 200-apartment retrofit might be €15,000-30,000 (mostly swapping out old stations for new ones). Total project cost might be €30,000-50,000 all-in. This is the Urmet sweet spot.
Installation (New Wiring Required): If you’re running new cabling anyway, Urmet’s cost advantage largely disappears. You’re now spending €5,000-15,000 on cabling labor, which eats into Urmet’s hardware price advantage.
Expansion: Adding apartments to a 2Voice system is relatively inexpensive—mostly just new apartment stations and some distributor module additions if needed. However, if expansion pushes beyond 2Voice capacity, migration to IPerCom requires infrastructure work and system replacement.
2N Cost Profile
Hardware: 2N Helios IP devices are generally premium-priced compared to Urmet, with door stations typically €300-700+ depending on integration features and video processing capability.
Installation (Modern Network Exists): If the building has properly provisioned IT infrastructure with spare network capacity, 2N installation complexity is mostly configuration work—network setup, device provisioning, integration testing. Labor cost for a 200-unit building might be €8,000-18,000 depending on integration complexity. Total project cost might be €40,000-80,000 depending on how many doors and integration points.
Installation (Network Doesn’t Exist or Is Inadequate): If the building needs network infrastructure improvements first, costs rise significantly—you might need to provision fiber backbone, add managed switches, set up proper VLAN isolation, and possibly hire IT contractors. This can easily add €20,000-60,000+ depending on the property’s age and IT infrastructure maturity.
Expansion: Adding capacity to 2N Helios IP means expanding network infrastructure and adding devices. There’s no architectural dead-end—theoretically you can scale to thousands of devices if the network supports it. However, network capacity planning is mandatory, not optional.
Real-World Scenarios
Scenario A: 180-apartment Italian building, 1970s-era 2-wire wiring, compatible and in working condition.
Urmet 2Voice: €40,000-55,000 total (reusing existing wiring, mostly labor for station swaps).
2N Helios IP: €80,000-120,000 total (requires new network infrastructure, IT configuration, potentially network upgrades if capacity is tight).
Winner: Urmet, by a significant margin.
Scenario B: 8-story modern office building, 500 people, existing Cat6 network, building management system in place.
Urmet 2Voice: €60,000-90,000 (requires running new 2-wire cabling through building, network integration not leveraged).
2N Helios IP: €50,000-80,000 (leverages existing network, integrates with access control and building management, future-proof for expansion).
Winner: 2N, slightly, due to existing infrastructure leverage and integration capability.
Scenario C: 400-apartment mixed-use property, planning major expansion in 5 years, no existing intercom wiring.
Urmet 2Voice: €50,000-75,000 initially, but expansion to 600 apartments in 5 years requires substantial additional work or migration to IPerCom, adding €30,000+.
2N Helios IP: €70,000-100,000 initially, but expansion to 600 apartments is architecturally simple—add network capacity and devices, no platform migration needed. Future-proofing is baked in.
Winner: 2N, when considering 10-year lifecycle cost.
Verdict
For retrofits of existing buildings with compatible wiring, Urmet typically delivers lower short-term cost. For new construction, modern buildings, or properties planning significant growth, 2N’s long-term value proposition often justifies the higher upfront cost.
Who Should Choose Urmet?
- You’re retrofitting a European apartment building with existing 2-wire intercom wiring that’s still functional.
- You want to minimize installation disruption and cost by reusing existing wiring infrastructure.
- Your building is primarily residential and intercom is the main system (limited access control or building automation integration needed).
- You have a tight budget and existing wiring that can be salvaged (potentially saving 40-60% on installation labor).
- You want simplicity: a standalone intercom system that doesn’t depend on IT infrastructure for basic functionality.
- Your building has limited IT infrastructure or IT staff, and you want to avoid introducing new dependencies.
Sipko Security conducts free wiring assessments to determine Urmet compatibility and often saves property owners tens of thousands by identifying reusable cabling.
Who Should Choose 2N?
- You’re building new or renovating a modern building where cabling is being run anyway.
- Your building has (or is planning to build) modern IT infrastructure with proper network management.
- You need to integrate intercoms with access control, fire systems, building automation, or emergency response from day one.
- You manage a large property or multi-building campus that needs unified communication and security management.
- You’re planning significant expansion in the next 5-10 years and want an architecture that scales without platform migrations.
- You want advanced features like video analytics, multi-camera integration, occupancy tracking, or remote management from a unified dashboard.
Sipko Security conducts network assessments and designs 2N Helios IP deployments for optimal performance and integration with your building’s existing systems.
Future-Proofing and Upgrade Paths
What happens 10 years from now when intercom technology evolves and your building needs new capabilities?
Urmet’s Upgrade Scenario
A building that installed 2Voice in 2016 can still operate it reliably in 2026. Parts availability for 10-year-old Urmet equipment is generally good. However, if the building wants to add features (access control, emergency systems, mobile app capability, video analytics), the upgrade path is either:
- Layer on separate systems (add an access control system alongside Urmet, manage them separately), or
- Migrate to Urmet’s IPerCom platform (which means new infrastructure and system redesign, not just adding modules).
Urmet 2Voice was engineered to solve a specific problem (adding video calling to old buildings without new wiring) and solves it well. But it’s not designed to be an extensible platform—it’s designed to be a reliable replacement for old analog intercoms.
2N’s Upgrade Scenario
A building that installed 2N Helios IP in 2016 can still operate it reliably in 2026. More importantly, adding new capabilities is often a firmware or hardware module addition, not a platform migration:
- Need mobile app access? Helios supports it natively through IP architecture; enable it via software.
- Want to add access control? Helios IP access readers integrate directly; no separate system needed.
- Need occupancy tracking or video analytics? New software features on the same hardware, or add analytics boxes to the network.
2N’s IP-native architecture was designed from day one to be extensible. New capabilities typically mean new features or modules on the same platform, not a complete system replacement.
Verdict
If you want to build infrastructure that can accommodate new capabilities without wholesale replacement, 2N’s IP-native architecture is more future-proof. Urmet is designed for long-term reliability in its specific use case (residential intercom retrofit), not for platform evolution.
Ready to Evaluate and Deploy Your Intercom System?
Sipko Security provides free infrastructure assessments and professional installation for both Urmet and 2N systems.
Frequently Asked Questions: Urmet vs 2N
Can I run Urmet and 2N intercoms in the same building?
Not natively. Both systems use proprietary protocols and architecture that aren’t cross-compatible. Some third-party gateway modules exist, but they’re expensive and often unreliable. It’s far better to standardize on one platform per building. Sipko Security can help you evaluate your building’s layout and recommend which single platform best fits your mixed needs.
How much can I really save with Urmet’s retrofit advantage?
If your building has existing 2-wire wiring that’s compatible and in good condition, Urmet retrofits can cost 40-70% less than equivalent 2N deployments due to reusing existing cabling. However, this advantage only exists when compatible wiring is actually present. Damaged or incompatible wiring eliminates the savings. Sipko Security offers free wiring testing to determine actual retrofit savings before you commit.
Is 2N’s IP-native architecture really worth the extra upfront cost?
That depends on your building’s age, growth plans, and integration needs. For a 100-apartment residential block that’s unlikely to expand, probably not. For a 400-unit property planning to add access control, emergency systems, and future integrations, or for a campus planning significant expansion, yes. 2N’s upfront investment typically pays off within 5-7 years for buildings with active management and growth plans. Sipko Security can model 10-year lifecycle costs for your specific property.
What if my building’s network is poorly managed?
This is a real concern with 2N. If your building’s IT is chaotic or understaffed, adding IP devices to an unstable network can create more problems than it solves. Urmet’s 2-wire approach avoids this dependency—the intercom operates independently of IT infrastructure. However, most modern buildings have adequate network infrastructure for intercoms if properly segmented (which Sipko Security handles during installation).
Can I upgrade from Urmet 2Voice to 2N Helios later?
Technically yes, but it’s expensive and disruptive. You’d essentially be installing a new system alongside the old one, then decommissioning the old system once the new one is proven. This costs more and takes longer than choosing the right system from the start. Make your long-term commitment now rather than planning to migrate later.
Which brand has better parts availability and support?
Both Urmet and 2N maintain parts for 15-20 year old systems, typical for the intercom industry. Urmet has exceptional parts support in Italy, France, and Germany due to its dominance in those markets. 2N has strong international support due to its global expansion. In any specific market, Sipko Security can verify parts availability and service response times before you commit to a platform.
Which system handles multi-building campuses better?
2N Helios IP is specifically designed for multi-building integration on a unified network—security staff can manage all buildings from one dashboard. Urmet requires either separate 2Voice systems per building (with manual inter-building call management) or migration to IPerCom IP for unified management, which is more complex. For campuses, 2N is the natural architectural fit.
Do either system require ongoing subscriptions or cloud services?
Core intercom functionality for both brands operates locally without subscriptions. Optional cloud features (mobile app access, cloud-based recording) may have licensing terms depending on the model and region. Sipko Security outlines all ongoing costs and subscription terms upfront so there are no surprises.
How long does installation typically take?
Urmet 2Voice (compatible wiring exists): 3-5 days for 100-200 apartments.
Urmet 2Voice (new wiring required): 2-3 weeks.
2N Helios IP (modern network exists): 1-2 weeks for 100-200 units, depending on integration complexity.
2N Helios IP (network needs upgrades): 3-4 weeks including network infrastructure work.
These timelines vary significantly based on building access, existing conditions, and integration requirements. Sipko Security provides detailed project schedules after the site assessment.
Which system is better for high-security environments?
2N Helios IP, because it integrates natively with access control, emergency systems, and video surveillance. For high-security installations, you want intercom, access control, and emergency response unified on one platform so security staff can respond immediately to intercom calls. Urmet can achieve this too, but it requires more manual integration work and management complexity.
Make Your Intercom Choice With Expert Guidance
Sipko Security specializes in both Urmet and 2N systems. We assess your building infrastructure, recommend the optimal system, and handle professional installation, configuration, and long-term support.
Licensed Security Professionals
Sipko Professional Security Architecture
Industry Standards & Resources
The following official standards bodies, regulatory resources, and manufacturer pages provide further reading on intercom systems and requirements discussed in this guide:
ISO — International Standards
Publishes international standards for building entry and access control systems, including ISO/IEC 29146 on access management frameworks.
IEC — Electrotechnical Standards
Maintains IEC 62820, the international standard covering technical requirements for building intercom systems including performance and test methods.
EN Standards — European Compliance
EN 60950 covers audio and video door communication equipment safety standards across EU member states and countries adopting European standards.
GDPR — EU Data Protection
Governs how video intercom footage and call data may be collected, stored, and processed for installations in the EU/EEA.
Urmet Official Systems
Manufacturer resource for current Urmet 2Voice and IPerCom intercom systems referenced in this guide.
2N Helios Systems
Manufacturer resource for 2N Helios IP intercom and entry systems referenced in this guide.
Disclaimer: This article links to official standards bodies, regulatory resources, and manufacturer pages for informational purposes. Sipko Security is not affiliated with ISO, IEC, CENELEC, or the EU institutions referenced above, nor with Urmet or 2N. Always verify current regulations and standards through official channels in your jurisdiction before installing or modifying intercom systems. Product specifications and pricing referenced here are based on publicly available manufacturer and distributor information and may vary by region, market, and model year.
