Intercom Comparison
European Building Entry Systems
International Guide
Fermax vs Urmet: European Intercom Brands Compared – 2026 Guide
When European property managers and installers evaluate next-generation intercom systems, two names dominate the conversation: Fermax, Spain’s modular systems engineering pioneer, and Urmet, Italy’s retrofit-friendly 2-wire specialist. But which system actually wins for residential apartments, office buildings, and campuses across Europe and beyond?
Introduction: Two Distinct European Engineering Approaches
The intercom market across Europe and internationally is shaped by two fundamentally different engineering philosophies, each born from a different market problem. Fermax, founded in Spain in 1968, built its reputation on modular, scalable systems engineered for purpose—hardware that snaps together in the factory, arrives on the job site fully configured, and integrates seamlessly into large multi-tenant deployments. Urmet, founded in Turin, Italy in 1937, grew up solving a different problem: how to retrofit existing buildings without tearing out decades-old wiring. Urmet’s signature 2-wire technology lets installers reuse a building’s existing intercom cabling, making renovation projects faster and cheaper.
This fundamental distinction cascades through everything else: how systems scale, how they integrate with other building technologies, how they’re installed, and ultimately, how much they cost over the lifetime of a building. Fermax approaches intercom installation as a complete systems design exercise. Urmet approaches it as a pragmatic retrofit that respects what’s already in the walls.
For property managers, facility directors, and security professionals evaluating these platforms today, the question isn’t which brand is objectively “better”—it’s which philosophy aligns with your building’s wiring situation, your deployment scale, your existing infrastructure, and your long-term growth plans.
Not sure which fits your building? Sipko Security evaluates both Fermax and Urmet systems and provides expert intercom installation services tailored to your building’s specific needs and existing infrastructure.
What Is Fermax? — Spain’s Modular Systems Pioneer
Modular Hardware Architecture
EasyComm IP Series
Fermax was founded in Zaragoza, Spain, in 1968, initially as a manufacturer of telephone intercoms and audio systems. Over five decades, the company has evolved into a comprehensive building entry and access control specialist with operations across Europe, North America, South America, and Asia. Fermax is particularly well established in Spain, Italy, France, the UK, and Northern Europe, and has grown significantly into markets across Latin America and the Middle East.
Fermax’s strategic philosophy centers on modular systems: instead of running wiring to individual apartments and then connecting them to a central processing unit, Fermax designs modular distribution hardware that connects to main distribution frames. The company’s flagship platform is EasyComm, a comprehensive IP-based communication system that unifies video intercoms, audio-only intercoms, access control readers, and emergency communication all on one network infrastructure. For buildings that aren’t ready for a full IP transition, Fermax also maintains a parallel line of analog and semi-analog systems that bridge traditional wiring with modern digital features.
Sipko Insight: Fermax is the engineering-first choice. If you’re building a new system or renovating without specific wiring constraints, Fermax’s modular hardware and IP-native design offer maximum flexibility for growth and integration with other building systems.
What Is Urmet? — Italy’s Retrofit and Flexibility Specialist
2-Wire Retrofitting
2Voice Digital Platform
Urmet, founded in Turin in 1937, has spent nearly a century solving one core problem: how do you add modern intercom and building entry technology to existing buildings without major reconstruction? Born in a market where thousands of apartment blocks were built with analog 2-wire intercom wiring decades ago, Urmet engineered its systems to work with that legacy wiring rather than against it.
Urmet’s signature innovation is the 2Voice platform: a digital intercom system that transmits audio, video, and control signals over a simple non-polarized 2-wire connection—the same type of wiring that ran through European apartment blocks for generations. This means installers can often connect new Urmet hardware directly to a building’s existing intercom cabling without any new wiring work, a massive advantage for renovations. For buildings pursuing a full IP migration, Urmet offers IPerCom, which transmits audio, video, and door-release signals over standard network cabling or fiber, supporting very long device-to-device distances (up to roughly 3 kilometers) useful for sprawling campuses.
Helpful Info: Urmet’s competitive advantage lies in cost-effective retrofitting of existing buildings. If your building already has intercom wiring in the walls—whether 40 years old or 4 years old—Urmet’s systems are engineered to make use of it rather than force you to replace it.
Head-to-Head: Core Metrics
| Feature | Fermax (Spanish Modular Pioneer) | Urmet (Italian Retrofit Specialist) |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1968, Zaragoza, Spain | 1937, Turin, Italy |
| Primary Philosophy | Modular, purpose-built systems design | Retrofit-friendly, legacy wiring compatible |
| Flagship Platform | EasyComm IP Series (unified modular) | 2Voice (2-wire) + IPerCom (IP) |
| Core Wiring Architecture | Modular distribution + analog or IP | 2-wire (2Voice) or standard IP (IPerCom) |
| Best Fit | New construction, large campuses, system integration | Building retrofits, existing wiring reuse, European apartments |
| Installation Approach | Comprehensive system design + network infrastructure | Utilizes existing wiring when possible |
| Mobile App Access | Native IP integration (select models) | CallMe app for 2Voice and IPerCom |
| Scalability | Modular expansion from small to massive campuses | Distributor-based scaling (apartments) or IP scaling (large sites) |
Architecture & Technology: Modular Systems vs 2-Wire Pragmatism
The deepest technical difference between these two brands lies in how they think about building integration, network topology, and future extensibility. These aren’t minor engineering choices—they influence installation cost, system flexibility, and long-term operational complexity.
Fermax’s Modular Distribution Approach
Fermax’s core architecture is built around modular distribution hardware. In a typical Fermax deployment for a mid-to-large apartment building, the installer runs cabling to a central distribution frame or rack—often in a ground-floor electrical closet or dedicated equipment room. From there, modular distribution cards branch out to individual apartments or building zones. Each module handles a specific function: one might manage door stations and access readers, another handles internal intercom traffic, a third handles video switching, and so on. This modular stacking approach gives property managers enormous flexibility to expand or reconfigure the system later without wholesale replacement.
Fermax’s EasyComm platform layers an IP foundation on top of this modular hardware. This means devices can communicate over traditional copper cabling or over a building’s existing network infrastructure, and can even be configured to use a mix of both depending on where devices are located. For large campuses or multi-building properties, this hybrid approach can dramatically simplify infrastructure planning—some clusters use traditional cabling for reliability, others use network cabling to leverage existing IT infrastructure.
Urmet’s 2-Wire Retrofit Architecture
Urmet’s 2Voice platform takes an almost opposite approach. Rather than require new infrastructure, the system is engineered to work over a simple 2-wire connection that Urmet calls “non-polarized”—meaning installers don’t need to worry about wire polarity during connection, and critically, can often reuse 2-wire cabling left behind by a previous analog intercom system. In a typical Urmet 2Voice retrofit, the installer identifies the existing 2-wire risers (the vertical cabling running through an apartment building), connects the new Urmet master unit to the input side of those risers, and branches out to individual apartments via distributor modules—often the same ones a previous vendor left in the walls decades earlier.
This is an enormous practical advantage for the retrofit market: instead of a multi-week wiring project involving wall demolition or expensive conduit work, an installer can often complete a 2Voice system upgrade in days or even hours, because most of the hard infrastructure (the wiring through the building’s vertical spaces) is already in place and compatible. Urmet’s IPerCom line handles buildings pursuing a full IP migration, offering the same distributed, modular benefits as Fermax but with an Urmet philosophy: compatibility with existing network infrastructure, support for long device-to-device distances via fiber or IP, and a clear upgrade path from 2Voice analog to IPerCom IP on the same building systems.
Practical Implications
New Construction or Major Renovation: If you’re building from scratch or completely gutting a building’s infrastructure, Fermax’s modular approach gives you maximum engineering flexibility. There’s no legacy wiring to work around, so you can design the optimal topology for the building’s actual needs.
Retrofit of Existing Building: If the building already has intercom wiring (2-wire or otherwise), Urmet’s retrofit philosophy can save tens of thousands in labor and wall patching. Reusing existing wiring is almost always cheaper than running new cabling, even if the old cabling is decades old.
Large or Complex Campus: Fermax’s modular distribution approach scales exceptionally well across multiple buildings or irregular layouts. Urmet’s IPerCom platform also scales to large sites, but Fermax’s modular hardware is typically the more natural choice for managing multiple independent zones that need to communicate with a central control point.
Verdict: Fermax is the architect’s choice for complex new systems. Urmet is the pragmatist’s choice for retrofits where legacy wiring exists and budget is a constraint.
Wiring Assessment & Infrastructure Planning: The right choice between Fermax and Urmet depends heavily on your building’s existing wiring infrastructure and long-term growth plans. Sipko Security conducts on-site infrastructure assessments to determine 2-wire compatibility, network readiness, and the most cost-effective deployment path for either platform.
Video Quality, Hardware Engineering, and Build Standards
Fermax’s Hardware Philosophy: Fermax positions itself as an engineering-first company, publishing detailed hardware specifications alongside its products. The company’s video door stations, particularly in the EasyComm line, typically feature high-resolution cameras (often 2MP or higher in current models) with wide-angle optics and integrated low-light performance. Indoor stations use color touchscreen displays with multi-window capability, allowing residents to view multiple camera feeds simultaneously—useful in buildings with cameras in lobbies, parking garages, and rear entrances in addition to the main front door. Fermax also emphasizes redundancy and failover: if the building’s primary network connection drops, devices can often fall back to local wiring-based communication rather than losing intercom functionality entirely.
Urmet’s Hardware Philosophy: Urmet publishes fewer granular hardware specifications than Fermax, instead emphasizing field reliability and long-term performance. The company’s door stations use solid zinc alloy construction rated to IP55 (dust and water protection), and current-generation Urmet panels feature cameras with up to 110° horizontal and 92° vertical fields of view, comparable to or exceeding many Fermax models in raw optics. Higher-end Urmet indoor stations include gesture recognition and voice control on some models, and the company’s 2Voice and IPerCom platforms support multiple simultaneous video feeds on tenant handsets. Like Fermax, Urmet also offers redundancy through dual-channel design: if one communication path fails, the system can often maintain service through an alternate connection.
Verdict: Both brands deliver technically sound hardware. Fermax leads in publishing detailed specifications and emphasizing modular, upgradeable video processing. Urmet leads in retrofit-compatible mechanical design and proven long-term field performance in aging European apartment buildings.
Multi-Tenant Scalability: From Duplexes to Campus Deployments
Property managers evaluating these systems often ask: which scales better when I eventually expand? Both brands scale effectively, but via different architectural paths.
Fermax Scaling: Modular Expansion at the Hardware Layer
Fermax’s modular approach means you scale by adding more distribution modules to the central frame rather than replacing the entire system. A building that starts with a 50-apartment EasyComm configuration can add 50 more apartments by simply sliding new distribution cards into the central frame—no new cabling to the main distribution point needed. This makes Fermax extremely attractive for properties planning future expansion, since the core infrastructure (the central equipment room, main distribution frame, and backbone cabling) can be designed to accommodate 2-3x the current user count without modification.
For multi-building campuses, Fermax’s hybrid analog-and-IP approach also helps: some buildings might use traditional cabling to the central frame (efficient for dense urban properties), while others use IP to branch out (efficient for sprawling suburban or industrial campuses). Fermax’s central management platform can often manage the entire campus as one logical system, even if the underlying physical architecture is heterogeneous.
Urmet Scaling: Distributor-Based Growth for Apartments, IP for Campuses
Urmet’s 2Voice platform scales using distributor units that branch the 2-wire bus. For apartment buildings, growth typically means adding new distributor modules in the building’s vertical spaces—a straightforward hardware addition that doesn’t require central frame upgrades since 2Voice operates over the existing building wiring. This is extremely cost-effective for mid-sized properties (roughly 50-500 apartments) where the building’s wiring infrastructure is already in place and functioning.
For larger or more complex sites, Urmet’s IPerCom IP platform takes over, offering modular scaling more similar to Fermax’s approach. The difference is that IPerCom is designed to run over standard network infrastructure rather than proprietary cabling, which gives IT departments more visibility and control but requires the building to already have (or be willing to invest in) proper network infrastructure.
Verdict
For mid-sized apartment buildings planning modest growth within the same property, Urmet’s distributor scaling is straightforward and cost-effective. For larger, more complex sites or multi-building properties planning significant expansion, Fermax’s modular frame architecture provides a clearer long-term growth path with less risk of needing a complete system replacement.
Installation: Speed, Complexity, and Hidden Costs
Fermax Installation Reality
Fermax’s modular architecture requires more upfront planning and infrastructure work. Before any intercom hardware goes into the building, the installer needs to design and run a backbone cabling infrastructure: running cable to a central distribution frame, planning how that frame connects to each zone or building section, and determining whether cabling will be analog, IP, or hybrid.
For new construction, this is straightforward—the architect and systems integrator design the cabling infrastructure before walls are closed, and installers execute that plan. For retrofits, this requires significantly more coordination: identifying where the central distribution frame will live, determining routing for new backbone cabling through walls or conduit, and potentially involving licensed electricians if high-voltage cabling needs to share spaces with the intercom infrastructure.
The upside is that once the infrastructure is in place, expanding the system is fast and non-disruptive: adding apartments or buildings usually means just dropping new modules into the central frame and connecting a handful of cables, with no impact to existing residents or operations.
Urmet Installation Reality
Urmet’s 2Voice retrofit approach is specifically engineered to minimize installation disruption and cost. In an ideal retrofit scenario—a European apartment building with working 2-wire cabling already in the walls—the installer’s work is relatively straightforward: connect the new Urmet master unit, verify the existing wiring, and replace or add individual apartment stations as needed. Many retrofits happen in just a few days with minimal disruption to existing residents, because no new walls need to be opened.
However, this advantage exists only when compatible wiring is already in place. If the building’s old wiring is damaged, incompatible, or missing entirely, the retrofit advantage disappears—you’re now running new cabling just like any other system, and Urmet loses its primary cost advantage.
For buildings pursuing Urmet’s IPerCom IP platform instead of 2Voice, installation complexity approaches Fermax’s level: the building needs proper network infrastructure, the installer needs to design network topology, and backbone cabling work is required.
Professional Assessment Is Essential
For either brand, the hidden cost variable is the building’s existing wiring and infrastructure readiness. Get a professional assessment before assuming either brand will be the “quick” or “cheap” option. What looks like a simple retrofit can get expensive fast if the existing wiring is incompatible or damaged.
Professional Installation & Infrastructure Planning: Whether you choose Fermax or Urmet, professional installation ensures proper design, wiring, network configuration, and optimization. Sipko Security specializes in both brands and conducts upfront infrastructure assessments to identify the true cost and complexity before work begins.
Where Each Brand Is Actually Used in Europe and Internationally
Fermax has particularly strong penetration in Spain (its home market), Italy, France, and the UK. The company has also built significant market share in Northern Europe and has grown aggressively in North America and Latin America over the past decade. Fermax’s modular systems philosophy and emphasis on systems integration make it popular with large property development firms, new residential towers, and institutional campuses that can afford comprehensive infrastructure planning upfront.
Urmet remains extremely well-established in Italy and France, with strong presence across Central Europe and Germany. The company is the de facto standard in older European apartment retrofits, where Urmet’s 2-wire retrofit advantage makes it the natural first choice for property managers and installers who know the existing wiring situation. Urmet also has growing market share in the UK, particularly for retrofit and renovation projects in historic buildings where Urmet’s minimal disruption philosophy is valued.
Geographically, if your building is in continental Europe (especially Italy, France, Spain, or Germany), you’ll likely find installers experienced with both brands. If you’re in the UK or Northern Europe, Urmet retrofit expertise may be easier to find for older buildings. If you’re outside Europe, Fermax’s larger international presence and systematic approach to documentation make it the more common choice, though Urmet is actively expanding globally.
System Integration, Smart Features, and Building-Wide Connectivity
Fermax’s Integration Ecosystem
Fermax positions EasyComm as the foundation for a unified building communication and security system. Beyond basic intercom calling, EasyComm’s architecture naturally supports integration with access control readers, emergency intercoms, fire alarm interfaces, and building automation systems. Because Fermax’s modular hardware is designed as a complete systems package from the start, adding a new function (like RFID card readers on apartment doors, or emergency panic stations in parking garages) often means just adding a new module to the central frame and running short cable runs to the physical location—no architectural redesign required.
Fermax also publishes SIP and VOIP integration guidelines, making it possible to tie EasyComm intercoms into a building’s existing phone system if the building has one. For large corporate campuses or office parks, this can mean a single business phone number that rings desk phones, mobile phones, and intercom stations simultaneously, creating a unified communication experience.
Urmet’s Integration Approach
Urmet’s integration philosophy is more conservative. The 2Voice platform’s main integration point is with home automation systems: Urmet’s higher-end handsets include built-in radio transmitter channels that trigger lighting or appliance scenes directly from the intercom panel. This is valuable for individual residences or small tenant spaces but doesn’t extend to building-wide systems integration in the same way Fermax’s modular approach does.
Urmet’s IPerCom IP platform, however, is more integration-friendly, offering SIP connectivity and supporting tie-ins with access control and emergency communication systems, similar to Fermax’s capabilities. The difference is that IPerCom is positioned as an upgrade path for larger buildings rather than the standard deployment—most Urmet installations remain on 2Voice, which has more limited integration possibilities.
Verdict
If your building needs to integrate intercoms with access control, emergency systems, and building automation from day one, Fermax’s modular architecture makes this straightforward. If you’re retrofitting a residential apartment building where intercom is the primary system and future integrations are speculative, Urmet’s simpler 2Voice approach may be sufficient and more cost-effective.
Total Cost of Ownership: Hardware, Installation, and Long-Term Expansion
Raw hardware cost comparisons between Fermax and Urmet are misleading because the actual cost variable in any real project is the installation scope and existing infrastructure.
Fermax Cost Profile
Hardware: Fermax’s modular distribution cards and IP-based equipment typically cost more per connection point than Urmet’s 2Voice equivalent, reflecting the increased engineering and IP networking capability baked into the hardware.
Installation: The big cost lever for Fermax is infrastructure planning and installation. If your building requires new backbone cabling to be run to a central distribution frame, that labor and materials cost can easily exceed the hardware cost, particularly in retrofit scenarios. Plan for 40-60% of the total project cost to be labor and infrastructure in a retrofit.
Expansion: The long-term advantage of Fermax is that expansion tends to be fast and non-disruptive once the initial infrastructure is in place. Adding 50 apartments to a Fermax system might mean just a few days of work to add modules and verify connections—no wall disruption needed.
Urmet Cost Profile
Hardware: Individual Urmet 2Voice components are generally less expensive per connection point than Fermax, reflecting the simpler 2-wire technology and lower integration capabilities.
Installation (Retrofit Scenario): If existing 2-wire cabling is available and compatible, Urmet’s retrofit cost is dramatically lower than Fermax—potentially 50-70% less, because most of the expensive backbone infrastructure is already in place. This is Urmet’s primary competitive advantage.
Installation (New Construction): If you’re running new cabling anyway, Urmet’s cost advantage largely disappears, because you’re paying for new infrastructure regardless of which brand you choose. In greenfield scenarios, Fermax’s more comprehensive systems approach might actually offer better value because you get more capability without additional infrastructure cost.
Expansion: Expanding a 2Voice system means adding distributor modules to the building’s existing wiring—straightforward and relatively low-cost. However, if expansion eventually exceeds the capacity of the existing 2-wire infrastructure, you may eventually need to migrate to IPerCom IP, which involves more substantial changes.
Real-World Example
Scenario: 200-apartment Italian building with existing 2-wire intercom cabling that’s 30 years old and needs complete replacement.
Urmet 2Voice Retrofit: Existing wiring is tested and found compatible. New 2Voice master unit installed in ground-floor equipment closet. Individual apartment stations replaced. Total project cost: 3-4 weeks labor, €25,000-40,000 total depending on cable routing and apartment access.
Fermax EasyComm Retrofit: New backbone cabling infrastructure designed and installed. Central distribution frame installed. Individual apartment stations connected. Modular capacity designed for future expansion. Total project cost: 6-8 weeks labor, €40,000-65,000 total, but with significantly more future-expansion capacity and building-wide integration capability.
In this scenario, Urmet is cheaper upfront, but if the building expands or eventually needs access control and emergency communication integration, Fermax’s infrastructure investment pays dividends.
Verdict
For retrofit projects where compatible wiring exists, Urmet typically delivers better short-term cost value. For new construction, large properties planning future expansion, or buildings requiring integrated access control and emergency systems, Fermax’s infrastructure investment often justifies itself over a 10-15 year building lifecycle.
Who Should Choose Fermax?
- You’re planning new construction or a complete building renovation with no existing intercom wiring constraints.
- You manage a large property (500+ units) or multi-building campus requiring unified system architecture.
- You need to integrate intercoms with access control, emergency communication, and building automation from day one.
- You plan significant expansion in the next 5-10 years and want infrastructure that scales non-disruptively.
- You’re outside of Europe or in a market where Fermax has stronger local support and parts availability.
- You want detailed technical specifications and modular hardware that third-party integrators can work with.
Sipko Security has extensive experience designing and installing Fermax systems for large properties and can help you evaluate whether the upfront infrastructure investment makes sense for your long-term building strategy.
Who Should Choose Urmet?
- You’re retrofitting an existing European apartment building with working 2-wire intercom cabling in the walls.
- You want to minimize installation disruption and cost by reusing existing wiring infrastructure.
- Your building is primarily residential and intercom is the main security system (no access control integration needed immediately).
- You’re in a European market (Italy, France, Germany) where Urmet has strong installer support and parts availability.
- You need a retrofit solution that can be installed quickly with minimal impact to existing residents or tenants.
- You have a tight budget and existing wiring that can be salvaged.
Sipko Security conducts free wiring assessments to determine if your existing 2-wire infrastructure is Urmet-compatible and can often save property owners tens of thousands in retrofit costs by identifying reusable cabling.
Migration Paths and Future-Proofing Your Investment
One question many property managers don’t ask until it’s too late: what happens 10 years from now when you want to add features the old system doesn’t support?
Fermax’s Upgrade Path
Because Fermax’s architecture is modular and IP-native from the start, upgrading typically means replacing or adding modules rather than replacing the entire system. A building that starts with basic EasyComm video intercoms can add access control readers, emergency communication, or advanced analytics (like AI-powered occupancy tracking) by simply adding new modules to the central frame and running short cable runs to the new hardware locations. The core infrastructure (the backbone cabling, the distribution frame itself) often remains unchanged for 15+ years.
Urmet’s Upgrade Path
Urmet 2Voice systems can remain useful for 15-20 years, particularly in residential settings where intercom calls haven’t fundamentally changed. However, if you eventually need access control, emergency systems, or analytics, your upgrade path is less clear: you can layer on additional (separate) systems alongside 2Voice, or you can migrate to IPerCom IP. Migration to IPerCom requires new cabling infrastructure and a system redesign—it’s not a simple module swap like Fermax offers.
That said, Urmet’s pragmatic approach means many buildings stay on 2Voice for 20+ years without feeling the need to upgrade, because the core functionality (video calling and door release) remains adequate for residential use. Fermax’s more ambitious architecture means you’re paying for future-proofing even if you never use it.
Verdict
Fermax is the choice if you want to build infrastructure that can accommodate new capabilities without wholesale replacement. Urmet is the choice if you want to solve the immediate problem cost-effectively and aren’t planning major system expansion or integration in the next decade.
Ready to Choose and Install Your Intercom System?
Whether you choose Fermax or Urmet, Sipko Security handles infrastructure assessment, professional installation, and ongoing support.
Frequently Asked Questions: Fermax vs Urmet
Can I mix Fermax and Urmet components in the same building?
Not reliably. Fermax and Urmet use proprietary call signaling and wiring protocols that aren’t cross-compatible out of the box. Mixing brands typically requires a third-party interface module (if one even exists for your specific models) or accepting reduced functionality. We always recommend standardizing on one platform per building. Sipko Security can evaluate your building and recommend the optimal single-brand approach.
How much does Urmet’s 2-wire retrofit really save compared to Fermax?
If your building has existing 2-wire cabling that’s compatible, Urmet retrofits can cost 40-60% less than running new infrastructure for Fermax. However, this advantage only exists when compatible wiring is present and in good condition. Damaged or incompatible wiring eliminates the savings. Sipko Security offers free wiring testing to determine actual retrofit feasibility before you commit to a system choice.
Is Fermax’s modular architecture really worth the extra upfront cost?
That depends on your building’s growth plans and integration needs. If you’re retrofitting a 100-apartment building that’s unlikely to expand significantly, the modular infrastructure investment may not pay off. If you’re retrofitting a 400-apartment building planning to eventually add access control and integrate with a building management system, Fermax’s infrastructure investment often justifies itself within 5-7 years. Sipko Security can help you model the long-term cost implications of each approach for your specific property.
Which brand has better parts availability and long-term support?
Both Fermax and Urmet maintain parts inventory for 15-20 year old systems, which is typical for the industry. Fermax tends to have broader international support due to larger global operations. Urmet has exceptionally strong parts availability in Italy, France, and Germany due to its dominant market position in those countries. In any market, Sipko Security can verify parts availability and serviceability for either brand before you make a commitment.
Can I upgrade from Urmet 2Voice to Fermax EasyComm later?
Technically yes, but practically it requires significant work: you’d be essentially installing a new system alongside the old one, then decommissioning the old system once the new infrastructure is proven. This is much more disruptive and expensive than upgrading within a single brand’s ecosystem. It’s better to anticipate your long-term needs and choose the right brand from the start.
Which brand is better for a historic building or heritage property?
Urmet’s retrofit philosophy makes it the natural choice for heritage properties where minimizing wall disruption and infrastructure changes is paramount. The ability to reuse existing wiring means you’re not drilling new conduit through stone walls or historic internal structures. For heritage buildings, Urmet’s pragmatic 2-wire approach is typically the best fit.
Do either system require a cloud subscription or ongoing service fees?
Core intercom functionality on both brands doesn’t require a subscription—this is locally controlled hardware with optional cloud integration. However, advanced mobile app features (Fermax’s cloud portal for property managers, Urmet’s CallMe cloud app) may have their own licensing terms depending on the specific model and region. Sipko Security can outline all subscription and service costs upfront in your proposal so there are no surprises.
How long does a typical installation take for each brand?
Urmet 2Voice Retrofit (compatible wiring exists): 3-5 days for a typical 100-200 apartment building.
Fermax EasyComm Retrofit (new infrastructure needed): 2-3 weeks for a typical 100-200 apartment building, plus additional time for infrastructure planning and electrical/cabling coordination.
Fermax New Construction: 1-2 weeks, assuming infrastructure was designed into the building’s overall construction plan.
These timelines vary significantly based on building access, existing infrastructure, and the complexity of final configuration. Sipko Security provides detailed project timelines after the site assessment.
Which brand is more resistant to vandalism and accidental damage?
Both brands use hardware rated to IP54-IP55 (dust and water protection) on door stations, so outdoor resistance is comparable. Urmet’s hardware tends to use solid zinc alloy construction, while Fermax uses composite materials on some models—both are durable in normal conditions. For high-vandalism environments, specify stainless steel, hardened plastic, or other reinforced materials with either brand, and Sipko Security can recommend model-specific options.
Is there a significant video quality difference between modern Fermax and Urmet cameras?
Not significantly. Both brands’ current-generation door cameras offer 2MP or higher resolution, comparable fields of view (90-110° horizontal), and similar low-light performance. The difference is more about the overall system architecture (Fermax’s multi-window switching vs Urmet’s simpler single-feed design on lower-end models) than raw camera performance. For specific video quality requirements, Sipko Security can arrange site visits with demonstration equipment from either brand.
Make Your Intercom Decision With Expert Guidance
Sipko Security specializes in both Fermax and Urmet systems. We assess your building’s infrastructure, recommend the right system, and handle professional installation, configuration, and long-term support—in Melbourne and across Australia.
Call Now
Contact Us
Service Area
Melbourne, Australia & International Consultation
Licensed Security Professionals
Sipko Professional Security Architecture
Industry Standards & Resources
The following official standards bodies, regulatory resources, and manufacturer pages provide further reading on intercom systems and requirements discussed in this guide:
ISO — International Organization for Standardization
Publishes international standards for building entry and access control systems, including ISO/IEC 29146 on access management frameworks used across Europe and globally.
IEC — International Electrotechnical Commission
Maintains IEC 62820, the international standard covering technical requirements for building intercom systems, including performance and test methods.
EN Standards — European Intercom Requirements
EN 60950 covers audio and video door communication equipment safety standards across EU member states and countries that adopt European standards.
GDPR — EU Data Protection Regulation
Governs how video intercom footage and call data may be collected, stored, and processed for installations in the EU/EEA.
Fermax Official Product Catalogue
Manufacturer resource for current Fermax video intercom and building entry systems, including the EasyComm product line referenced in this guide.
Urmet Official Intercom Systems
Manufacturer resource covering Urmet’s 2Voice and IPerCom intercom series referenced in this guide.
Disclaimer: This article links to official standards bodies, regulatory resources, and manufacturer pages for informational purposes. Sipko Security is not affiliated with ISO, IEC, CENELEC, or the EU institutions referenced above, nor with Fermax or Urmet. Always verify current regulations and standards through official channels in your jurisdiction before installing or modifying intercom systems. Product specifications and pricing referenced here are based on publicly available manufacturer and distributor information and may vary by region, market, and model year.
